PHILOSOPHICAL MODELS OF EXPLAINING HISTORICAL PROCESSES

Authors

  • Abduvohidova Laziza Farhod qizi Teacher of the Jizzakh branch of the National University of Uzbekistan Author
  • Spanov Meiirkhan M. Auezov South Kazakhstan University, Candidate of Philosophical Sciences, Associate Professor Author

Keywords:

philosophy of history, historical process, philosophical models, determinism, civilization theory, formational approach, cyclical development, postmodernism

Abstract

Understanding historical processes has always been one of the central problems of philosophy. History is not merely a chronological sequence of events but a complex, multi-layered process shaped by economic, political, cultural, ideological, and spiritual factors. This article provides a comprehensive philosophical analysis of the main models used to explain historical processes. The study examines deterministic, idealistic, materialist (formational), civilizational, cyclical, and postmodern approaches to historical interpretation. Each model is analyzed in terms of its methodological foundations, explanatory power, and limitations. The research argues that no single philosophical model is sufficient to fully explain historical development. Instead, an integrative and pluralistic approach is required to grasp the complexity and multidimensional nature of historical reality. The findings contribute to contemporary debates in the philosophy of history by highlighting the necessity of methodological diversity in historical explanation.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Little D. Philosophy of history. – 2007.

Spanov M., Kamolov D. MODERN PROBLEMS AND SOLUTIONS OF DEMOCRACY AND MORALITY IN UZBEKISTAN //Science technology&Digital finance. – 2023. – Т. 1. – №. 4. – С. 168-172.

Dostonbek K. SPIRITUAL AND MORAL ENVIRONMENT OF SOCIETY //Social science and innovation. – 2023. – Т. 1. – №. 2. – С. 128-133.

Mink L. O. Philosophical analysis and historical understanding //The review of metaphysics. – 1968. – С. 667-698.

Kamolov D. THE MORAL VIEWS ON PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION AND LEADERSHIP IN NIZAMULMULK’S “THE POLICY” //Journal of Contemporary World Studies. – 2024. – Т. 2. – №. 2. – С. 47-50.

Roth P. The philosophical structure of historical explanation. – Northwestern University Press, 2019.

Камолов Д. Spiritual and moral environment of society //Информатика и инженерные технологии. – 2023. – Т. 1. – №. 2. – С. 278-282.

Pompa L. Philosophy of history //The Blackwell companion to philosophy. – 1996. – С. 428.

Kаmоlоv D. ETHICS ОF АRTIFICIАL INTELLIGENCE: EXPLОRING THE MОRАL АND SОCIАL IMPLICАTIОNS ОF АI IN CОNTEMPОRАRY SОCIETY //SGS-Engineering & Sciences. – 2023. – Т. 2. – №. 02.

Harré R. History and philosophy of science in the pedagogical process //Science under Scrutiny: The Place of History and Philosophy of Science. – Dordrecht : Springer Netherlands, 1983. – С. 139-157.

Kamolov D. GLOBALIZATION PHENOMENON AND GLOBALISM //SGS-Engineering & Sciences. – 2023. – Т. 2. – №. 02.

Downloads

Published

2025-12-31

How to Cite

Abduvohidova , L., & Spanov , M. (2025). PHILOSOPHICAL MODELS OF EXPLAINING HISTORICAL PROCESSES. Scientific Journals "D-PRESS SERVICES", 3(7), 70-74. https://d-pressa.com/index.php/dps/article/view/638